Skip to content
All projects

Health tech2022–2026

Lifting-Assistive Device (LAD)

A wearable that helps people with limited arm strength lift, built as an affordable alternative to commercial devices. Four years of design reviews, from a resin cuff and a thread to a geared actuator that took 3rd place at the Engineering Expo 2026.

3rd place, Engineering Expo 2026
Client
James Lewallen, CO, UW Health Orthotics & Prosthetics
Years
2022–2026
Area
Health tech
Result
3rd place, Engineering Expo, spring 2026

The problem

Lifting your arm should not cost $20k

The client’s patients need help lifting their arm. The commercial option, the MyoPro, is described on the team’s project page as:

“Clunky, expensive (over $20k), and offers varying responsiveness.”

The goal from the first semester: a device that does the same job at a fraction of the cost, that is comfortable to wear and that responds when the wearer wants it to.

The MyoPro, the commercial device the team set out to beat on price.
MyoPro components, for comparison.

How it was built

Step by step

Fall 2022Design review

MK I: cuffs, a linkage and a thread

The first design wrapped the arm in two cuffs joined by an aluminum bar linkage. A motor pulling a thread would assist the lift.

Cuff

  • Printed in Elastic 50A resin

Firmware

  • Zephyr RTOS, written in C
  • Raspberry Pi Pico, debugged with a Picoprobe

Motor

  • L293D dual H-bridge
  • Bipolar stepper motor
  • Battery powered
MK I on a model of the arm.
Cuffs and the bar linkage.
The cuff, designed to be printed in elastic resin.
Motor circuit: H-bridge and stepper.

Spring 2023Minimum viable prototype

“A tug on the thread was achieved”

The cuffs were attached with velcro and the motor pulled the thread for the first time. Cuff 2.0 used about 80% less material than the first cuff.

Goals set for the next semester: a pulley, enclosures and the motor software.

The minimum viable prototype, worn.
Cuff 2.0: about 80% less material.
Cuff 2.0, printed.
Printed cuff with the thread.
Next: the pulley.
Next: the enclosures.

Fall 2023MK II

Fixing what MK I taught them

MK I worked, and it showed what had to change. The team listed the problems and fixed them one by one. The electrical sub-team set a clear goal: “establish communication between the firmware and the motor w/out setting the device on fire.”

What was wrong

  • Uncomfortable to wear
  • Friction at the joint
  • Power supply not isolated from the user
  • Risk from the LiPo battery
  • Messy software; Zephyr was overkill
  • No battery monitoring

What changed

  • Flexible 80A resin → TPU, about 10% cheaper
  • Spool moved closer to the bar
  • Aluminum → PLA ($0.10–0.12 per gram)
  • Bearings at the elbow and the wrist
  • Motor enclosure removed

The new board

  • U1 at 3.3 V, H-bridge at 5 V
  • Li-ion battery with a protection IC
  • Buck converters and capacitors
  • LED test points
MK II on the arm.
Cuff printed in TPU.
TPU joint, printed.
Cuff with a bearing seat.
Ring cuff.
The spool, moved closer to the bar.
Bars in PLA instead of aluminum.
Contact pads.
The MK II circuit board.
Schematic: microcontroller.
Schematic: H-bridge.
Schematic: battery protection.
Schematic: buck converters.

Spring 2024Engineering Expo 2024

A working arm, driven by a PS4 controller

For the Engineering Expo 2024 the team overhauled the assembly, the motor type, the devices on the circuit board and the software. Visitors could drive the arm themselves with a PS4 controller: “Intuitive and fun for kids (and adults).”

Mechanical

  • ABS printed supports and joints
  • TPU contact pads replace the cuffs
  • Custom-formed aluminum plating
  • Semi-enclosed motor and PCB
  • Adjustable securement
  • 12 V DC worm gear motor: more torque, and the motor locks in place

Electrical

  • Brushed DC motor with integrated gearbox, 12 V instead of 24 V
  • No backdrive current, lower temperatures, same control circuitry
  • Battery: 2400 mAh instead of 1000 mAh, with built-in charging
  • ESP32-WROOM-32E: Bluetooth, two I²C buses, PWM
  • Several boards merged into one

Software

  • Bluetooth PS4 controller for the Expo
  • Master MAC address changed to the ESP32
  • Right stick drives the motor up and down
On the Expo board.
Engineering Expo 2024.
The booth.
The Saturday crew.
Worn by a team member.
The assembled arm.
Main board and IMU board, merged into one.

After Expo 2024Where it was headed

Sensors, a smaller battery and a 10 lb goal

After the Expo the team set the next targets. The benchmark: lift 10 lbs independently.

Electrical, next

  • IMU
  • Load cell
  • Smaller battery
  • Goal: lift 10 lbs independently

Next steps listed

  • Improve range of motion
  • Control method: bump switches, thread tension
  • Enclose the battery, the motor and the pulley
  • Potentiometer and velcro
  • Comfort

Later

  • Automatic input from force sensors and a potentiometer
  • Max and min bounds, with controller rumble at fairs
  • LCD display
  • Brainstorm interactivity for fairs
The post-Expo version, worn.
Render with the worm gear motor.
Where the load cell and potentiometer go.

2024–2025New mechanism

The drawbridge

The team explored new ways to move the arm, including a “drawbridge”: the wrist and the shoulder tethered by a thread, so the forearm rises like a bridge. The build aimed at the Engineering Expo in April 2025.

The drawbridge mechanism.
Testing the fit.

2025–2026Engineering Expo 2026

Geared actuator, 3rd place

A geared actuator replaced the drawbridge, and backpack-like straps hold the device on the body. The team upgraded the motor driver and the battery, and added current sensing and rotation limits in software. After a design review the LAD went to the Engineering Expo and took 3rd place.

The geared actuator.
The upgraded circuit board.

Credits

Who made it

Client

James Lewallen, CO, UW Health Orthotics & Prosthetics